Come along, John

Reblog if you’re a proud member of the Holmes fandom

perfectlyqueer:

Not just Sherlock.

Not only Ritchie verse.

Not only Granada. 

ALL OF THE HOLMES UNIVERSE.

If you love the great detective created by the glorious Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, reblog this.

It’s not about who does the best adaption, it’s about accepting each and every universe.

via hehasamustache · originally by perfectlyqueer
The Sherlock fandom complains about 1-year-long hiatuses; now imagine if we lived in the times of sir Arthur Conan Doyle.

mishlocked:

With a 10-year hiatus between 1893 and 1903.

I would have died. I really would have died.

via tricksterwithcandy · originally by misha-bawlins

A Study in Scarlet↪ Mr Sherlock Holmes

A Study in Scarlet
↪ Mr Sherlock Holmes

via thorsbutt · originally by johnhwatson-
Sherlock Holmes hasn't been this mainstream since the 1800's when people were like:
  • Woman 1: "OMG did you read Mr. Holmes' new mystery yet!?!?!?"
  • Woman 2: "NO! I was out late harvesting grain or some shit I do in the 1800's so I didn't get to read it yet."
  • Woman 1: "OMG dude, put down your cow milking bucket and go read that shit RIGHT. NOW. It's so good."
  • Woman 2: "Okay okay! No spoilers! I'm leaving right now to get it. Milk my cow while I'm gone okay?"
  • Woman 1: "FINE. But only if you agree to talk about it after you're done reading so we can fangirl."
  • Woman 2: "DUH. Of COURSE. I'll brb. -picks up skirt and runs to store-"
via its-an-ear-hat-john · originally by shmem-the-pem

thedetectiveandthewoman:

When Arthur Conan Doyle originally killed Sherlock Holmes?

People went around wearing black, and one woman wrote a letter to Doyle addressed, “You murderer!”

There is nothing new in fandom.

:’D The fandom that’s stretched for more than a century. 

via ibeggedformercytwice · originally by dreamsofthings
dragons24601:

I felt that in honor of Sherlock season 2, I needed to go back and reread the original stories. I decided to start with Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Sign of Four. This is one of his only full length novels (most of the Sherlock stories are in short story form). It starts when Mary Morstan (for any who know, these stories, you recognize that she later becomes John Watson’s wife) comes to Holmes with a very curious case. 10 years ago, her father disappeared. 6 years ago, she started receiving a precious pearl every year on a specific date. Then she receives a note asking her to meet her unknown benefactor. Holmes and Watson accompany her to the meeting and hear a fantastic story full of death and treasure, half of which is rightfully hers. However, when they go to collect the treasure, they discover it missing from a locked room with a man dead inside. The game is afoot!
This book demonstrates Arthur Conan Doyle’s brilliance as a storyteller. We are just as awed as Watson when Holmes continues to reveal exactly how things occurred. However, we also see very human moments. Holmes isn’t completely infallible, and it’s fun to see him laugh at his own mistake. Well, kind of mistake. Also, if anyone has seen any movies or shows, it is even more fun because you pick up on all these things that the writers added in to tribute him. I wish I could review this to do him justice, but I can’t. All I can say is READ IT!
Personally, I give this 5 stars, because you really can’t beat Sherlock Holmes. 

dragons24601:

I felt that in honor of Sherlock season 2, I needed to go back and reread the original stories. I decided to start with Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Sign of Four. This is one of his only full length novels (most of the Sherlock stories are in short story form). It starts when Mary Morstan (for any who know, these stories, you recognize that she later becomes John Watson’s wife) comes to Holmes with a very curious case. 10 years ago, her father disappeared. 6 years ago, she started receiving a precious pearl every year on a specific date. Then she receives a note asking her to meet her unknown benefactor. Holmes and Watson accompany her to the meeting and hear a fantastic story full of death and treasure, half of which is rightfully hers. However, when they go to collect the treasure, they discover it missing from a locked room with a man dead inside. The game is afoot!

This book demonstrates Arthur Conan Doyle’s brilliance as a storyteller. We are just as awed as Watson when Holmes continues to reveal exactly how things occurred. However, we also see very human moments. Holmes isn’t completely infallible, and it’s fun to see him laugh at his own mistake. Well, kind of mistake. Also, if anyone has seen any movies or shows, it is even more fun because you pick up on all these things that the writers added in to tribute him. I wish I could review this to do him justice, but I can’t. All I can say is READ IT!

Personally, I give this 5 stars, because you really can’t beat Sherlock Holmes. 

Wait, WHAT?

radiolocked:

sherlockbbc:

Hang on hang on hang on. I just realized there’s a Sherlock Holmes story called The Adventure of the Solitary Cyclist.

Did the fandom already notice this at large and I’m just late to the party?! DOES IT MEAN ANYTHING or is it just a cool little random reference!?

THAT DIDN’T EVEN CONNECT TO MY MIND UNTIL NOW. BRILLIANT. I love it when they take reference on the other stories! Like in the Great Game! Ahh! Genius!

via inspectahradio · originally by sherlockbbc

earhat-deathfrisbee:

especiallygoodfinder:

the-more-i-arty:

Because Arthur deserves some of the blame too.

DAMMIT DOYLE!

I swear we’re descended from them. 1893 = riots in the streets, 2012 = graffiti EVERYWHERE.

via freetobeyouandme · originally by the-more-i-arty